SmartPeptide
CognitiveLimited human evidence

Semax

Heptapeptide analog of ACTH(4-10) studied in Russia for cognitive and neuroprotective effects after stroke.

Educational only — not medical advice. SmartPeptide does not prescribe, diagnose, or treat. Always consult a licensed healthcare provider before using any peptide, supplement, medication, or protocol.

What the research shows

Russian post-stroke and cognitive-performance studies; some BDNF/neurotrophic mechanism work.

What's still experimental

Limited western replication. Cognitive-enhancement claims in healthy adults need larger trials.

Anecdotal / community reports

Focus and clarity reports are common; outcomes depend on dose, formulation, and individual factors.

Anecdotal reports are NOT scientific evidence. They reflect personal experience and may not generalize.

FDA approval status

Source: openFDA + DailyMed (NIH/NLM)
No FDA-approved drug label exists for “Semax”. This peptide is not currently approved by the FDA as a finished pharmaceutical product. Any commercial product claiming FDA approval should be treated with suspicion.

Doses studied in research

No established dose range

What published trials tested or FDA-approved labels specify. Reporting research facts — not a SmartPeptide recommendation.

No FDA-approved or established trial dose range for this peptide. Anecdotal ranges discussed in community forums exist but are not supported by published clinical trials, and SmartPeptide will not publish unverified doses.

This is the honest answer for peptides like BPC-157, IGF-1 LR3, MOTS-c, Epitalon and similar research compounds — robust human dose- ranging studies have not been published. Always work with a licensed clinician familiar with experimental peptides if you are considering any use.

FDA enforcement & recalls

Live · openFDA Drug Enforcement API
No FDA enforcement actions (recalls, market withdrawals, safety alerts) on record for “Semax”. This is the expected baseline for most peptides — the absence of recalls does NOT imply general safety, only that no formal FDA enforcement has been initiated against approved formulations.

Mechanism & targets

ChEMBL · UniProt · Open Targets
No mechanism data indexed in ChEMBL, UniProt, or Open Targets for “Semax”. This is common for unscheduled research peptides that haven't been studied in structured target-binding assays.

Live research

PubMed · ClinicalTrials.gov · Europe PMC · OpenAlex
PubMed papers
230
total
Human studies
51
MeSH: humans
Clinical trials
4
published
Active trials
0
0 total registered

Recent PubMed studies

Search "semax" on PubMed

Europe PMC — 325 additional records

Includes EU/UK studies and PubMed Central full-text articles. Often surfaces research weeks before PubMed indexes it.

Research volume (OpenAlex topic graph)

Total works
1,177
all years
Last 5 years
576
recent activity
Open access
817
freely readable
OA share
69%
of all works

Human clinical evidence

Semantic Scholar · AI TLDRs · influence-ranked
Total indexed
511
all human + lab studies
Meta-analyses
0
highest evidence
Systematic reviews
0
quality-weighted
Clinical trials
0
published RCTs etc.

Most influential human studies

Ranking blends meta-analysis > systematic review > clinical trial weight with influential-citation count and recency. AI TLDRs by Semantic Scholar / Allen Institute for AI.

Research funding & verification

NIH RePORTER · CrossRef DOI registry

Publication landscape

CrossRef · DOI registry
Indexed works (CrossRef)
211
all DOIs registered
Retracted papers
0
no retractions on record
Top funders of indexed research
  • Russian Foundation for Basic Research5 works
  • Russian Science Foundation4 works
  • Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography1 works
  • MIUR FIRB_MERIT1 works
  • MIUR1 works
  • Innovation and Technology Fund1 works

Funder diversity is a credibility signal. Research concentrated in a single drug company's funding warrants more scrutiny than research funded across NIH, charities, and academic grants.

Preprints — cutting edge

bioRxiv · medRxiv · via Europe PMC

Preprints have NOT been peer-reviewed. They are early research shared by authors before formal validation. Treat findings as preliminary.

Showing 3 of 3 preprints indexed by Europe PMC.

Known risks

Mostly Russian-source data; not approved by FDA.

Reported side effects

Limited safety data in Western populations.

FDA adverse event reports (FAERS)

Updated quarterly by FDA
Reports filed
2
FAERS, all years
Serious reports
1
50% of reports
Top reporting countries
  • US1

Most-reported reactions

  • Dyspnoea
    1
  • Electrocardiogram Qt Prolonged
    1
  • Eye Pain
    1
  • Product Advertising Issue
    1
  • Somnolence
    1

Counts from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Voluntary reports — they show what was reported, not whether the drug caused the event. Many reports lack confirmation. FAERS docs

What requires medical supervision

Not FDA-approved. Limited western safety data.

Questions for your clinician

  • Is there independent (non-Russian) replication?
  • What baseline cognitive testing would we do to track effect?

Editorially curated references

Discussions about Semax

Start a discussion
No discussions yet — be the first. Share what you've learned, what worked, what didn't, or a study you want translated into plain English.
See all Semax discussions Native, moderated, no buying or selling