SmartPeptide
SkinLimited human evidence

GHK-Cu

Copper tripeptide studied in dermatology for skin remodeling and wound contexts. Topical formulations are widely used in cosmetics.

Educational only — not medical advice. SmartPeptide does not prescribe, diagnose, or treat. Always consult a licensed healthcare provider before using any peptide, supplement, medication, or protocol.

What the research shows

Topical GHK-Cu has dermatology RCTs supporting effects on collagen, skin barrier, and post-procedure recovery. Reasonable mechanistic data for fibroblast and keratinocyte effects.

What's still experimental

Injectable use in humans is largely unproven. Hair-loss and systemic anti-aging claims need larger trials.

Anecdotal / community reports

Cosmetic skin and hair-thickness reports are widespread; topical formulations are widely available OTC.

Anecdotal reports are NOT scientific evidence. They reflect personal experience and may not generalize.

FDA approval status

Source: openFDA + DailyMed (NIH/NLM)
No FDA-approved drug label exists for “GHK-Cu”. This peptide is not currently approved by the FDA as a finished pharmaceutical product. Any commercial product claiming FDA approval should be treated with suspicion.

Doses studied in research

No established dose range

What published trials tested or FDA-approved labels specify. Reporting research facts — not a SmartPeptide recommendation.

No FDA-approved or established trial dose range for this peptide. Anecdotal ranges discussed in community forums exist but are not supported by published clinical trials, and SmartPeptide will not publish unverified doses.

This is the honest answer for peptides like BPC-157, IGF-1 LR3, MOTS-c, Epitalon and similar research compounds — robust human dose- ranging studies have not been published. Always work with a licensed clinician familiar with experimental peptides if you are considering any use.

FDA enforcement & recalls

Live · openFDA Drug Enforcement API
Total actions
2
recalls + withdrawals
Ongoing
2
not yet completed
Class I (serious)
0
health hazard / death risk
  • Class IIOngoing· Voluntary: Firm initiated
    FDA record

    GHK-Cu (Copper Peptide) for Injection, all strengths and presentations, GenoGenix, LLC, 2840 NW 2nd Ave Ste 204 Boca Raton, FL 33431-6692.

    Reason: Lack of Assurance of Sterility

    Jul 30, 2025·GenoGenix LLC
  • Class IIOngoing· Voluntary: Firm initiated
    FDA record

    GHK-CU, 10 MG/ML, 5 ML vial, The Guyer Institute of Molecular Medicine, Indianapolis, IN

    Reason: Lack of Assurance of Sterility: due to concerns with production processes which cannot assure sterility of products intended to be sterile.

    Nov 30, 2020·Advanced Nutriceuticals, LLC
FDA classifications: Class I = reasonable probability of serious adverse health consequences or death. Class II = temporary or medically reversible adverse consequences. Class III = unlikely to cause adverse health consequences.

Mechanism & targets

ChEMBL · UniProt · Open Targets

Molecule (ChEMBL)

View on ChEMBL
Formula
C65H88CuN14O19S2
Known mechanisms of action
  • Unknown
    Diagnostic agent

Live research

PubMed · ClinicalTrials.gov · Europe PMC · OpenAlex
PubMed papers
174
total
Human studies
61
MeSH: humans
Clinical trials
3
published
Active trials
1
2 total registered

Recent PubMed studies

Search "GHK-Cu" on PubMed

Research volume (OpenAlex topic graph)

Total works
967
all years
Last 5 years
540
recent activity
Open access
872
freely readable
OA share
90%
of all works

Human clinical evidence

Semantic Scholar · AI TLDRs · influence-ranked
Total indexed
922,385
all human + lab studies
Meta-analyses
0
highest evidence
Systematic reviews
6
quality-weighted
Clinical trials
0
published RCTs etc.

Most influential human studies

Ranking blends meta-analysis > systematic review > clinical trial weight with influential-citation count and recency. AI TLDRs by Semantic Scholar / Allen Institute for AI.

Research funding & verification

NIH RePORTER · CrossRef DOI registry

NIH-funded research

U.S. National Institutes of Health
Funded projects
8,674
all years
Top award sum
$327.7M
aggregate USD
Years covered
18
research span
Largest active / recent grants

Publication landscape

CrossRef · DOI registry
Indexed works (CrossRef)
281,198
all DOIs registered
Retracted papers
0
no retractions on record
Top funders of indexed research
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China26,542 works
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China3,521 works
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities2,561 works
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation1,775 works
  • National Research Foundation of Korea1,684 works
  • National Science Foundation1,314 works

Funder diversity is a credibility signal. Research concentrated in a single drug company's funding warrants more scrutiny than research funded across NIH, charities, and academic grants.

Preprints — cutting edge

bioRxiv · medRxiv · via Europe PMC

Known risks

Topical use is generally well tolerated; injectable use lacks robust safety data.

Reported side effects

Skin irritation in sensitive users.

FDA adverse event reports (FAERS)

Updated quarterly by FDA
Reports filed
1
FAERS, all years
Serious reports
1
100% of reports

Most-reported reactions

  • Anaphylactic Shock
    1
  • Blood Pressure Decreased
    1
  • Flushing
    1
  • Heart Rate Decreased
    1
  • Hyperhidrosis
    1
  • Hypersensitivity
    1
  • Immobile
    1
  • Loss Of Consciousness
    1
  • Pallor
    1
  • Syncope
    1

Counts from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Voluntary reports — they show what was reported, not whether the drug caused the event. Many reports lack confirmation. FAERS docs

What requires medical supervision

Topical use is generally well tolerated. Injectable forms warrant clinical supervision.

Questions for your clinician

  • Topical vs injectable — what's the evidence delta for my goal?
  • Are there interactions with other dermatologic treatments?

Editorially curated references